BALLADEX
Balladex/NFL/Compare/Calvin Johnson vs Steve Largent

Calvin Johnson vs Steve Largent: head-to-head statistical comparison

CJ
79IMPACT
Calvin Johnson
Detroit Lions · Wide Receiver
SL
64IMPACT
Steve Largent
Seattle Seahawks · Wide Receiver
VS
0–4
categories
Largent leads the head-to-head, 4 categories to 0.
Rebuildvs

Calvin Johnson vs Steve Largent stats

731
Receptions (career)
819
11,619
Receiving yards (career)
13,089
83
Receiving TDs (career)
100
13.8
Yards per catch
14.4

Awards & honors edge: Johnson

3× First-Team All-Pro6× Pro BowlHall of Fame (2021)
🏆
First-Team All-Pro7× Pro BowlHall of Fame (1995)

Who is better: Johnson or Largent?

Largent sweeps Johnson across all 4 shared categories (receptions, receiving yards, receiving tds, and more).

79Johnson · Star starter
Balladex Impact Index
64Largent · Solid starter

Card value — head to head

Calvin Johnson
$59
Cemented legacy
5-yr outlook+37%
Legacy floor100%
RarityEpic
Steve Largent
$49
Cemented legacy
5-yr outlook+39% ▲
Legacy floor100%
RarityEpic
Card verdictCalvin Johnson is the more valuable card today ($59 vs. $49). Steve Largent carries more projected upside (+39% vs. +37% over five years).

Related comparisons

Calvin Johnson vs Steve Largent: FAQ

Who is better, Calvin Johnson or Steve Largent?

Largent sweeps Johnson across all 4 shared categories (receptions, receiving yards, receiving tds, and more).

Who has more receptions, Calvin Johnson or Steve Largent?

Steve Largent: 819 to Calvin Johnson's 731 (Receptions (career)).

Who has more receiving yards, Calvin Johnson or Steve Largent?

Steve Largent: 13,089 to Calvin Johnson's 11,619 (Receiving yards (career)).

What awards have Calvin Johnson and Steve Largent won?

Calvin Johnson: 3× First-Team All-Pro, 6× Pro Bowl, Hall of Fame (2021). Steve Largent: First-Team All-Pro, 7× Pro Bowl, Hall of Fame (1995).

How does Balladex decide who wins?

Each shared stat is a category; the player ahead in more of them leads. Here that is 0–4. Stats and awards are real; the verdict is arithmetic on them, not an opinion.